My recent Mises Daily Article titled Two
Common Objections to Unilateral Free Trade drew some criticism that I would
like to answer.
Unilateral
free trade rewards the country that adopts it
Several commented that my use of the term "unilateral"
negated my argument. They resurrected the argument that free trade is
beneficial to both parties only if both agree to remove trade
barriers to the other's products. Otherwise, the party that removes its trade
barriers suffers economically by having its industries destroyed by the party
that keeps its trade barriers in place. This argument stands all of economics
on its head by asserting that consumers are required to support producers;
whereas, the purpose of production is to meet consumer demand. If one producer,
whether domestic or foreign, wishes to lower its price, accept a lower return
on capital, obtains an agreement from its employees to work for less, and thusly
is able to capture more market share, no one is harmed. Even if a government
taxes its citizens in order to provide subsidies to some producers, this is no
concern of the consumers or producers in another country. It is no business of
anyone other than the taxpayers of the subsidizing government. These people
have a legitimate gripe, for they are being robbed to pay privileged insiders
within their own country. Producers in the country that lowered its trade
barriers have the choice to redirect their capital to other uses and employees
have the freedom to work in other industries. The country's cost of living
drops, and its standard of living rises. Even those workers temporarily unemployed
will benefit from this lower cost of living.
Concentrate
solely on freeing one's own economy
Others commented that my use of the term "unhampered market"
negated my argument. I pointed out that there is always more work to be done
and that there is opportunity for all in an unhampered market. These commentators
pointed out that no country has an unhampered market; therefore, unilateral
free trade would cause permanent unemployment. This makes two false
assumptions. One, that workers can only train for one job in a lifetime and,
two, that it is futile to lower barriers to employing capital and labor
efficiently in one's own country. The obvious proper response is to insist that
one's own government allow its citizens full economic freedom and not waste its
time trying to persuade other governments to adopt economically sound policies.
If other countries wish to punish their own citizens, that is their business
and not ours. In fact we are made richer by their poor policies which provide
us with subsidized products.
Conclusion
The only just policy that any government can take is to free its own
economy to allow its citizens to purchase any legal product no matter where
produced. This provides investors and workers with the only government help
they need; i.e., the freedom to employ their capital and labor wherever it may
achieve the greatest return. A nation's citizens will enjoy the highest
possible standard of living that adopts low taxes, the few regulations that
merely support normal commercial law to protect citizens from fraud, and sound
money to allow producers and consumers alike to correctly value their present
transactions and expected future returns.
A corollary to freeing a market economically is to reduce public
expenditures that discourage rational actors from engaging in socially
destructive behavior. Welfare payments of all kinds, taxpayer supported public
schools, unsound and unfunded government mandatory retirement schemes all
reduce socially beneficial behavior. In fact our nation's so-called immigration
problem would go a long way to being solved if neither immigrants nor native
born citizens had access to welfare, so-called free public schooling, free or
subsidized housing, etc. on demand, nor could they trespass on either public or
private property. This may not solve the immigration problem to everyone's
satisfaction, but it would be a huge step in the right direction.
The only economic problems that this country or any country faces come
from its own misguided attempts to thwart the free market within its own
borders. Stop complaining about what other countries are doing for the simple
reason that they cannot harm us. Our economic future lies in our own hands.